ABOUT SOME CRIMINOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE PERSONNEL OF THE STATE CRIMINAL-EXECUTIVE SERVICE OF UKRAINE, WHO COMMITTED CRIMES
Keywords:
criminological features, personality of an offender, personnel of the bodies and establishments of the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine, scope of punishmentAbstract
From the criminological point of view the article analyzes the significant features of the criminal offenders, who belong to the personnel of the bodies and establishments of the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine. It reveals the main types of subjects, who commit crimes in the sphere of enforcement of sentences.
In the structure of the personality of such offenders there are both the general and criminological signs, as well as the special (specific) features, which are envisaged by the social and legal status of the personnel of the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine and by the approved procedures of the personnel selection, training and increase of qualification at the institutional training centers and educational establishments.
Concerning the criminal and legal features, which characterize the personality of such offenders, the crimes, which were committed alone, prevail (74%); the crimes, which were committed by them together with the convicts, constitute 23%. The main motives for committing crimes by the personnel of the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine: a) illegal benefit – 66% in the structure of the crime subjects; b) mistaken sense of careerism – 11%; c) hooliganism – 9%; d) false self-esteem – 7%; e) other motives, including those, which were not established during the criminal proceedings (pre-trial investigation) – 7%.
The purposes of the crimes, which were committed by the personnel of the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine, were the following: 1) illegal enrichment – 69% in the structure of the crime subjects; 2) increase of the own authority – 12%; 3) satisfaction of the personal psychological state (revenge, jealousy, etc.) – 11%; 4) other purpose, including those, which were not established during the criminal proceedings (pre-trial investigation) – 8%.
References
2. Кримінологічні та оперативно-розшукові засади запобігання злочинам і правопорушенням, що вчиняються персоналом виправних колоній : монографія / за заг. ред. В. В. Коваленка. Київ : Атіка, 2011. 367 с.
3. Про діяльність підрозділів охорони, нагляду та пожежної безпеки установ виконання покарань у 2016 році : інформ. бюл. Київ : Міністерство юстиції України, 2017. 43 с.
4. Брызгалов В. Н. Режим в местах лишения свободы. Киев : ГУИТУ МВД СССР, 1976. 114 с.
5. Проти катувань : Огляд повідомлень про жорстоке поводження і застосування катувань в Україні (червень 2001 р. – грудень 2002 р.) / за заг. ред. Б. Захарова. Харків : Фоліо, 2004. 224 с.
6. Огляд рішень Європейського суду з прав людини. Донецьк : Донецький Меморіал, 2011. 55 с.
7. Закалюк А. П. Курс сучасної української кримінології : теорія і практика : [У 3 кн.]. Кн. 1 Теоретичні засади та історія української кримінологічної науки / А. П. Закалюк. Київ : Видавн. дім «Ін Юре», 2007. 424 с.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Т. Попельнюк

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




CC License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)