FEATURES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL REGULATION OF DETERMINATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BEGINNING IN UKRAINE AND FOREIGN COUNTRIES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Keywords:
criminal procedural law, the start of criminal proceedings, the Unified Register of pre-trial investigations, crime codified law, the prosecutor, the police inquiry, criminal justice authorities, attorney serviceAbstract
The article is devoted to features of criminal procedural regulation of determination of criminal proceedings beginning in Ukraine and Western European countries. The legislator, having refused of established and traditional approaches to affairs of lawmaking and law enforcement practice of Ukraine, borrowed a lot from the legislation of foreign countries. Then on the basis of the comparative analysis the procedural aspects and some law norms were indicated which regulate the beginning of prejudicial inquiry in foreign countries. It was found out that the usual «borrowing» provisions of criminal procedural legislation of countries with the Anglo-Saxon law system and the Roman-German one is not substantiated enough. Such offers as a rule do not take into account the significant differences of the law system of Ukraine of other countries. As the continental law system is mainly based on the judicial practice gained during ages. While the law system of Ukraine functions on the basis of legislation but not the case law likewise it does in other countries of the European continental law system. Then on the ground of the comparative analysis of features of criminal procedural regulation of determination of criminal proceedings beginning in Western beginning of prejudicial inquiry European countries the principles of the activity were separated regardless of law systems. Also the procedural mechanism of the beginning of prejudicial inquiry and procedure was analyzed which is based on the expediency principle.
References
2. Гуценко К. Ф., Головко Л. В., Филимонов Б. А. Уголовный процесс западных государств [изд. 2-е, доп. и испр.].М.: Изд-во «Зерцало-М», 2002. 528 с.
3. Голяк Л. В., Мацко А. С., Тюріна О. В. Порівняльне правознавство: курс лек-цій. Київ: МАУП, 2004. 200 с.
4. Лубенский А. И. Предварительное расследование по законодательству ка-питалистических государств. М., 1977. 160 с.
5. Филимонов Б. А. Основы теории доказательств в германском уголовном процессе. М.: Фирма «Спарк», 1994. 157 с.
6. Курдова А. В. Права защитника в США при проведении полицией процессу-альніх действий в отношении подозреваемого, обвиняемого. Юрист. 1998. № 7. С. 58.
7. Махов В. Н. Уголовный процесс США (досудебные стадии): учеб. пособие. М.: ЗАО «Бизнес-школа», «Интел-Синтез», 1998. 207 с.
8. Молдован А. В. Кримінальний процес: Україна, ФРН, Франція, Англія, США: навч. посіб. Київ: Центр навч. л-ри, 2005. 352 с.
9. Калиновский К. Б. Законность и типы уголовного процесса: дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. СПб., 1999. 208 с.
10. Вакулік О. А., Азаров Ю. І. Початок досудового розслідування у криміналь-ному провадженні: навч. посіб. Київ: «Центр учбової літератури», 2015. 184 с.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 O. Vakulik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




CC License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)