Consistency of judicial practice as the basis for understanding the doctrine of legal precedent

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34015/2523-4552.2020.4.10

Abstract

The article deals with the analyse of the doctrine of legal precedent, with an emphasis on the historical aspects of the acquisition of precedent features of the source of law, which will establish its legal significance and importance for legal systems where it is not yet officially recognized as a source of law.

In addition, the study of the legal force of legal precedent as a regulator of legal relations, clarifying its role and place among other sources of law at the present stage of development of legal systems of European countries, by analyzing legislation and studying the views of scholars from different countries.

A review of scientific researches on this topic indicates that in different periods the problem of the legal force of the legal precedent has always been in the focus of attention of domestic and foreign scientists. The legal precedent is a complex concept that contains the result of a decision of a case by a law enforcement body, which contains a legal principle (stare decisis) that is mandatory for use in solving similar cases in the future, that is, in fact, it is a kind of model for regulating subsequent similar legal relations.

The legal precedent is a general concept, since in legal activity it is possible to distinguish judicial, administrative and other precedents, because the need for precedent regulation is based on the dynamism of social life and the needs of the adaptability of the law.

References

1. Пархоменко Н. М. Єдність судової практики як складова правового регулювання. Часопис Київського університету права. 2020. № 3. С. 26–30.
2. Шевчук С.В. Прецедентне право Європейського Суду з прав людини та доктрина stare decisis. Право України. 2010. № 10. С. 147–157.
3. Міхайліна Т. Аспекти співвідношення правового прецеденту та судової практики у контексті правосвідомості. Журнал східноєвропейського права. 2017. № 45. С. 88–96.
4. Cross R. Precedent in English Law. Clarendon Press. 1991. 256 p.
5. Walker R. J. The English legal system. London : Butterworth, 1970. 536 p.
6. Derham D. P. Precedent and the Decision of Particular Questions. The Law Quarterly Review. Vol. 79. January 1963. P. 49.
7. Шевчук С. Узгодженість практики Європейського суду з прав людини та Конституційного Суду України. Вісник Конституційного Суду України. 2011. № 4–5. С. 122–130.

References
Parkhomenko, N. M. (2020) Unity of judicial practice as a component of legal regulation. Journal of Kyiv University of Law, 3 [in Ukrainian].
Shevchuk, S.V. (2010) Case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the doctrine of stare decisis. Law of Ukraine, 10 [in Ukrainian].
Mikhailina, T. (2017) Aspects of the relationship between legal precedent and case law in the context of legal awareness. Journal of Eastern European Law, 45 [in Ukrainian].
Cross, R. (1991) Precedent in English Law. Clarendon Press.
Walker, R. J. (1970) The English legal system. London: Butterworth.
Derham, D. P. (1963) Precedent and the Decision of Particular Questions. The Law Quarterly Review, 79. January.
Shevchuk, S. (2011) Consistency of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, 4-5, 122-130 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2021-03-27

How to Cite

[1]
Бондаренко, Є. 2021. Consistency of judicial practice as the basis for understanding the doctrine of legal precedent. Bulletin of the Penitentiary association of Ukraine. 4 (Mar. 2021), 107–112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34015/2523-4552.2020.4.10.

Issue

Section

Theory and history of the state and law; the history of political and legal st