Peculiarities of the Legal Awareness in the Ancient Rome’s Republican Period as a Factor of the Religious Tolerance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34015/2523-4552.2019.3.09Keywords:
collective legal awareness, freedom of religion, legal institute of religious tolerance, Ancient RomeAbstract
The article deals with the peculiarities of the forming of a tolerant attitude towards other religions in the collective consciousness of the titular majority of the population of the Ancient Rome. The article supports a view that religious tolerance was inherent in the general views and the culture of the Roman political community, which was reflected in its legal system and had a positive effect on expanding the state's borders, establishing the relations with the population of the annexed territories by guaranteeing their freedom of religion, and reducing the social strains. The development of the Roman state and its domination over the conquered or annexed territories formed the concepts of the idealization and supremacy of the Roman statehood, legal system, culture and traditions, their superiority over all similar phenomena of the other peoples, the emergence of what is now classified as “imperial mentality”. But the unique feature of this phenomenon in Rome was that, unlike many other imperial state formations, the Romans did not seek to convert other peoples to their standards, but tended to differentiate and recognize their subjects’ identity. Till the IV century the Romans used the religious freedom of the federates to help in setting the religion as one of the identification marks. The peculiarities of the formation of the Roman legal awareness regarding the regulation of the religious relations were realized in the legal institute of religious tolerance, which in the future, through the reception of the Roman law and culture, was incorporated into the foundations of the Western tradition of law, and in the modern period was included in the complex of the inalienable human rights.
References
1. Попадинець Г. О. Правосвідомість і правова культура як чинники становлення громадянського суспільства. Львів, Видавництво Львівської Політехніки, 2006. С. 422–427.
2. Калиновський Ю. Ю. Правосвідомість українського суспільства: ґенеза та сучасність : монографія. Харків : Право, 2008. 288 с.
3. Ливий Тит. История Рима от основания города. В 3 т. Москва : «Ладомир», 2005. 793 с.
4. Крюков Д. А. Мысли о первоначальном различии плебеев в религиозном отношении. Пропилеи. Москва : В университетской типографии, 1854. кн. IV, 80 с.
5. Лашкарев П. Отношение Римского государства к религии вообще и к христианству в особенности. Киев : Тип. Еремеева, 1876. 148 с.
6. Senatus consultum de Bacchanalibus. URL: http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/scbaccanalibus.html (дата звернення 10.11.2019).
7. Светоний, Гай Транквилл. Жизнь двенадцати Цезарей. Москва : «Азбука», 2015. 480 с.
8. Покровский И. А. Лекции по истории римского права. Римське право в університеті Св. Володимира. Кн. 1. Київ : Либідь, 2010. С. 439–440.
References
1. Popadinec, G. O. (2006). Pravosvidomist i pravova kultura yak chinniki stanovlennya gromadyanskogo suspilstva. Lviv, Vidavnictvo Lvivskoyi Politehniki [in Ukrainian].
2. Kalinovskij, Yu. Yu. (2008). Pravosvidomist ukrayinskogo suspilstva: geneza tasuchasnist : monografiya. Harkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
3. Livij, Tit (2005). Istoriya Rima ot osnovaniya goroda. V 3 t. Moskva: «Ladomir» [in Russian].
4. Kryukov, D. A. (1854). Mysli o pervonachalnom razlichii plebeev v religioznom otnoshenii. Propilei. Moskva: V universitetskoj tipografii [in Russian].
5. Lashkarev, P. (1876). Otnoshenie Rimskogo gosudarstva k religii voobshe i k hristianstvu v osobennosti. Kiev: Tip. Eremeeva [in Russian].
6. Svetonij, Gaj Trankvill. (2015). Zhizn dvenadcati Cezarej. Moskva: «Azbuka» [in Russian].
7. Pokrovskij, I. A. (2010). Lekcii po istorii rimskogo prava. Rimske pravo v universiteti Sv. Volodimira. Kn. 1. Kiyiv: Libid [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ю. Цвєткова

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




CC License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)